-Company law: company formation, equity disputes, corporate governance, etc.
-Commercial litigation: contract disputes, intellectual property disputes, labor disputes, etc.
-Real estate and construction projects: real estate project development, construction contract disputes, etc.
Educational background:
Education: Bachelor
Graduate school: Zhengzhou University
Specialty: Law
Practice Experience:
Lawyer Hu Ge focuses on corporate governance, real estate, equity disputes and other civil and commercial dispute resolution business. Since working as a lawyer, he has been involved in handling many civil and commercial litigation and arbitration cases such as construction project contract disputes, house lease contract disputes, real estate sales contract disputes, equity transfer contract disputes, financial loan contracts, marriage and family disputes, accumulated a large number of litigation and arbitration experience and skills, and corporate governance and other aspects of practical experience, and has dealt with a number of major civil and commercial cases.
Performance display:
1. The client Cai and a Shenzhen Investment Co., Ltd., Wang's equity transfer contract dispute arbitration, revocation of arbitration award, non-enforcement of arbitration award, re-arbitration, enforcement objection, reconsideration and a series of disputes. The amount of the arbitration subject matter involved in the case was nearly 0.4 billion yuan. Cai mou, acting as the applicant, obtained the ruling result that the respondent paid 0.27 billion yuan for the equity transfer and paid liquidated damages according to the standard of 5/10000 per day, and has realized part of the rights and interests through enforcement. Since the case involved multiple complex legal relationships such as equity in a Hong Kong company, domestic land owned by a Hong Kong company, foreign exchange control, NDRC filing, due diligence, etc., after the client obtained a successful arbitral award, the respondent attempted to deny the validity of the effective arbitral award by various means, including re-initiating arbitration. To date, none of the nearly ten cases or legal proceedings by the respondent for the purpose of negating the arbitral award in force has been supported.
2. A series of disputes over housing sales contracts between a real estate company in Shenzhen and an electronic technology co., ltd. in Shenzhen. The six companies filed a lawsuit claiming that they suffered heavy losses due to the client's breach of contract, and requested the client to compensate for the loss of house price difference and interest loss (the amount requested by each company ranges from hundreds of thousands to several million). The court of first instance only decided to terminate the contract and refund the paid house purchase price, and rejected the six companies' claims on house price difference and interest loss. The client has hundreds of similar purchase customers in the same batch. If the house price difference and interest loss are supported, the client will incur hundreds of millions of yuan in losses. After the judgment of the first instance, all parties automatically performed according to the first instance, no enterprise filed an appeal, the case was closed, and good social and legal effects were achieved.
3. Client Wuhu City, a tourism city investment and development Co., Ltd. and a construction engineering group Co., Ltd. construction project contract dispute case. The amount of the litigation subject matter involved in the case was nearly 0.2 billion yuan. The acting defendant obtained the litigation result of rejecting all the plaintiff's litigation claims. Under the comprehensive sorting and strong cross-examination of the agent, the plaintiff was forced to approve all the deducted amount of the project funds. All potential disputes of the principal's six construction projects were solved in a package through one case, thus avoiding many lawsuits, recovering losses and reducing the litigation burden for the principal.
4. The case of a dispute over an intermediary contract between an investment group co., ltd. in Shenzhen and a technology co., ltd. This case is an inter-house contract dispute, the plaintiff asked the client to pay inter-house fees and other tens of millions of yuan, after the agent carefully combed and verified the evidence of the contract project involved in the case, formulated a detailed agency plan, the final court decision rejected the plaintiff's all claims, the client does not need to pay any inter-house fees.
5. The case of a dispute over the lease contract between an industrial investment co., ltd. in dongguan city and a hardware products co., ltd. in dongguan city. This case is a dispute over a house lease contract. The plaintiff, a hardware products Co., Ltd. in Dongguan City, sued the client to return the rent and compensate for the loss, totaling more than 25 million yuan. The agent client finally obtained a court judgment to reject all the plaintiff's claims, and instead compensated the client for more than 200 yuan.
Social Responsibility: Zhengzhou University Shenzhen Alumni Association Council Contact:
Email: huge@sdlaw.cn
E-mail: huge@sdlaw.cn
